Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium2. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Vredestein Quatrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein allround tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Viking (32%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Quatrac 5 has a better rating of 36% compared to 32% of the Viking Fourtech. The first tyre test of Viking Fourtech was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Vredestein Quatrac 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Fourtech and the Quatrac 5 were tested.
| # | Viking Fourtech | Vredestein Quatrac 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Satisfactory2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Viking Fourtech ? dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 47,4 | 50,8 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 | 43,9 | 48,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||