Segment
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than Yokohama (43%). In this particular case, the Kumho PorTran CW51 has a better rating of 40% compared to 32% of the Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the BluEarth winter WY01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 has B rating.
| # | Kumho PorTran CW51 | Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||