Segment
2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR D4 has a better rating of 54% compared to 51% of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 is made in Hungary and WR D4 is made in Finland.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 | Nokian WR D4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian WR D4 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | 2 | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: - | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2,6 | 2,4 | 2,2 | 2,1 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: - | 3+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||