Segment
2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 vs. Nokian WR A4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has a better rating of 51% compared to 47% of the Nokian WR A4. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Nokian WR A4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 and the WR A4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C wet grip rating, whereas 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B rating. We also know where Winter i*cept evo2 W320 is made - Hungary.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 | Nokian WR A4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR A4 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR A4 9.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended2. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian WR A4 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Not recommended | 4+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,2 | 9,9 | 10 | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Still recommended | 6,8 | 8,3 | 8,1 | 7,3 | |||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Still recommended | 6,3 | 9,2 | 7,1 | 10 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||