Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Yokohama (31%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 has a better rating of 81% compared to 34% of the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and the Advan Sport V105 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (88%) of the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is made - Korea.
# | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R23 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 35,3 | 34,7 | |||||
Show test details |