Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we will be looking at two high-performance summer tyres, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti. Both tyres have an 87% rating on our website, making them reliable options for those seeking ultra-high-performance tyres for their vehicles.
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is a Korean-made tyre often used as original equipment for high-end vehicles such as the Audi Q8, Audi SQ8, Porsche Cayenne, and BMW X3. On the other hand, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is a Dutch-made tyre that is also specifically designed for high-performance vehicles. Neither of these tyres have been replaced by newer models. Let's take a closer look at how these two tyres perform in various tests.
In the Autobild tyre test, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 ranked 3rd out of 53 tyres, while the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti secured the 9th position. The Vredestein tyre performed exceptionally well in various wet conditions, such as aquaplaning, wet braking, wet handling, and wet side guidance.
Meanwhile, in the ADAC tyre test, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 finished in 14th place out of 16 tyres, whereas the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti secured a more impressive 7th position. In this test, the Vredestein tyre excelled in mileage and exterior noise, showcasing its long-lasting durability and quiet performance.
Conclusion:
Both the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti rank highly on our website and are excellent options for those who require ultra-high-performance summer tyres. In overall test performance, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti seems to have a slight edge, primarily thanks to its superior wet-driving capabilities and impressive results in the ADAC test.
Nonetheless, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 should not be overlooked, as it too boasts solid performance and is often chosen as original equipment for luxury vehicles. This comparison highlights the strengths of both tyres, and we recommend considering these factors when making your final decision. To learn more about these tyres, visit the respective manufacturer websites for Hankook and Vredestein.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 35,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 35,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||