Segment
1. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Fulda EcoControl HP has a better rating of 51% compared to 48% of the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the EcoControl HP and the EcowinG ES01 KH27 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C rating.
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP | Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP 69 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 37 | 39,6 | |||||
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 | 38,3 | 40,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||