• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P

Table of contents:

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Firestone (50%). In this particular case, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 has a better rating of 69% compared to 50% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 4 was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Winterhawk 4 and the WR Snowproof P were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Winterhawk 4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof P also have B wet ratings. We also know where Winterhawk 4 is made - Italy.

# Firestone Winterhawk 4
/69%
 		Nokian WR Snowproof P
/50%

Add to comparison

New comparison
DimensionsR14 - R20 R17 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,825,4
Firestone Winterhawk 43626,4
Nokian WR Snowproof P3626,2
Show test details
Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+2+2+
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Rating: Satisfactory		23+2+ 2+
Nokian WR Snowproof P
Rating: Satisfactory		3+22-2
Show test details
ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 225/50 R17
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWear
Best values in test1,61,91,52,12,71,5
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Rating: Satisfactory		2,13,31,92,1 2,92,5
Nokian WR Snowproof P
Rating: Satisfactory		3,32,22,72,1 2,82,5
Show test details