Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Nokian Powerproof
Table of contents:
| # | Firestone Roadhawk | Nokian Powerproof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we will be taking a closer look at two summer tyres: the Firestone Roadhawk and the Nokian Powerproof. Both tyres have received positive feedback from various tests and are produced by well-established tyre manufacturers: Firestone and Nokian. Let's dive into the details and see which tyre performs better overall and under specific driving conditions.
Starting with the Firestone Roadhawk, this tyre has an overall rating of 71%, making it a respectable choice for those in need of a summer tyre. The Roadhawk does not have any previous models or any newer tyre that has replaced it, which means it is still a current model in the Firestone lineup.
On the other hand, the Nokian Powerproof comes with an impressive overall rating of 85% and is manufactured in Finland. Just like the Roadhawk, this tyre has no previous models or newer replacements. This indicates that the Powerproof is also a current model in the Nokian lineup.
In the Autobild test, the Firestone Roadhawk ranked 11th out of 50 tyres, while the Nokian Powerproof secured the 2nd position. This shows a clear advantage for the Powerproof in terms of its performance and capabilities compared to the Roadhawk. The Nokian Powerproof was praised for its excellent dry braking, wet braking, and wet handling characteristics during the tests.
According to the autobild 2022 test summary for the Nokian Powerproof, the tyre's strengths include good aquaplaning properties, impressive dynamic wet handling, and short braking distances. However, it also pointed out some minor drawbacks, such as delayed steering response and reduced stability on dry roads, limited mileage, and a high price level.
In conclusion, both the Firestone Roadhawk and Nokian Powerproof are solid choices for a summer tyre, but the latter stands out with its overall better test results and superior performance in key areas such as wet braking and handling. However, the Roadhawk may still be a suitable choice for drivers who prioritize a lower price or prefer the Firestone brand. Ultimately, the decision will depend on individual preferences and priorities but, overall, the Nokian Powerproof appears to be the stronger contender in this comparison.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB2. Nokian Powerproof 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 34,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||