Segment
2. Firestone Destination Winter Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Firestone (50%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has a better rating of 68% compared to 42% of the Firestone Destination Winter. The first tyre test of Firestone Destination Winter was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Destination Winter and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Destination Winter has B wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C rating.
# | Firestone Destination Winter | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Firestone Destination Winter Upper-middle
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
1. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
Firestone Destination Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 3,5 | 3,2 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,0 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 2,1 |
Show test details |