Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
| # | Falken Azenis FK510 | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R99 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this article, we will be comparing two popular summer tyres: the Falken Azenis FK510 and the Kumho Ecsta PS71. Both tyres have been put to the test in various competitions, and we will summarize the results from these tests, focusing on their strengths and weaknesses so you can determine which tyre is best suited for your needs.
The Falken Azenis FK510 is a high-performance summer tyre with a rating of 90% on our website. It is made by Japan and Turkey based tyre manufacturer Falken and has been replaced by the Falken Azenis FK520. On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is also a summer tyre with a rating of 79% on our website, produced by Kumho, and there hasn't been a newer model that replaced it yet.
Comparing their test results, we can see that the Falken Azenis FK510 performed better overall. In the ADAC test, the Falken tyre ranked 8th out of 16 competitors, while the Kumho tyre ranked 10th. The Azenis FK510's best features in this test were interior noise, wet handling, and mileage. Kumho Ecsta PS71's strengths lie in its aquaplaning performance, both in cross and longitudinal tests.
In the Autobild test, the Falken Azenis FK510 scored even better, ranking 6th out of 53 total tyres, with standout features such as exterior noise, price/value, and rolling resistance. Meanwhile, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 ranked 18th in the same competition, without any specific best features mentioned.
Lastly, in the ACE test, the Falken Azenis FK510 outperformed the competition, ranking 1st out of 11 tyres, with top marks in dry driving behavior, dry handling, exterior noise, wet braking, and wet handling. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 came in a close second, with its best features being aquaplaning performance and exterior noise.
In summary, the Falken Azenis FK510 is the better tyre among the two, performing exceptionally well in both dry and wet driving conditions. Its strengths include great noise performance, handling, and mileage. However, it has a slightly higher fuel consumption compared to the Kumho Ecsta PS71. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 performs well in aquaplaning resistance and noise performance but has no other notable strengths. Therefore, if you are looking for a high-performance summer tyre with excellent handling and noise performance, the Falken Azenis FK510 is the clear winner. However, if aquaplaning resistance is your main concern, you might want to consider the Kumho Ecsta PS71 as a viable alternative.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1 | 2 | 3- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 29 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 37,1 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 150 | 55 | 39 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended | 150 | 66 | 46 | 16 | 9 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Recommended | 149 | 67 | 44 | 14 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||