Segment
2. Hankook Ventus ST RH06 Premium
Comparison: Continental SportContact 5 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus ST RH06
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Hankook (63%). In this particular case, the Continental SportContact 5 SUV has a better rating of 77% compared to 60% of the Hankook Ventus ST RH06. The first tyre test of Continental SportContact 5 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Hankook Ventus ST RH06 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 265/60 R18 test, where both the SportContact 5 SUV and the Ventus ST RH06 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 68% of Continental SportContact 5 SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Hankook Ventus ST RH06 has C rating.
| # | Continental SportContact 5 SUV | Hankook Ventus ST RH06 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus ST RH06 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Hankook Ventus ST RH06 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||