Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1-evo Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Hankook Ventus S1-evo
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Bridgestone (57%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1-evo has a better rating of 60% compared to 58% of the Bridgestone Potenza S001. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza S001 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Hankook Ventus S1-evo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Potenza S001 and the Ventus S1-evo were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Hankook Ventus S1-evo | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1-evo Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1-evo Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||