10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than BFGoodrich (67%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 89% compared to 76% of the Goodyear UltraGrip 9. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Goodyear UltraGrip 9 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Használtautó.hu 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the UltraGrip 9 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 63% of Goodyear UltraGrip 9 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and UltraGrip 9 is made in Slovenia.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /89%	Goodyear UltraGrip 9 /76%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R14 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 39

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 17x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 1.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 9.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 3.65

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 2020

Best rating in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9
88%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

Wet braking

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 85%

Wet handling

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet circle cornering

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9
82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Dry braking

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry lane changing

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 100%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Dry steering response

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Dry driving behavior

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
94%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9
78%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 87%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 86%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 69%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 74%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9
76%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 70%

Comfort

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Interior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 70%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69 dB

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9
80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%

Rolling resistance

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

Price/value

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 74%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel efficiency

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 85%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9
82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%

Ice braking

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

Ice lateral guidance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 78%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Használtautó.hu Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on ice
Best values in test	13,9	14,8	16,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	15,1	15,9	23,3
Goodyear UltraGrip 9	15,3	15,8	18,5
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands