10 shops, 90 283 products

|

Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Nokian WetProof

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Apollo (47%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 83% compared to 56% of the Apollo Alnac 4G. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G and the WetProof were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Apollo Alnac 4G /56%	Nokian WetProof /83%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R17	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Nokian WetProof 47

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 32

Number of tests

1. Nokian WetProof 14x

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 8x

Best position in test

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 2.

Worst position in test

1. Nokian WetProof 17.

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 30.

Average position in tests

1. Nokian WetProof 5.64

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88

Year of the last test

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 2023

2. Nokian WetProof 2023

Best rating in test

1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary

2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Nokian WetProof Recommended

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WetProof
83%

Apollo
Alnac 4G
75%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Nokian WetProof 72%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Nokian WetProof 89%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 80%

Wet braking

1. Nokian WetProof 85%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 69%

Wet circle cornering

1. Nokian WetProof 89%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 83%

Wet handling

1. Nokian WetProof 82%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 73%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nokian WetProof ?

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WetProof
84%

Apollo
Alnac 4G
82%

Exterior noise

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 82%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nokian WetProof 68 dB

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ? dB

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WetProof
77%

Apollo
Alnac 4G
68%

Dry braking

1. Nokian WetProof 91%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 77%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Alnac 4G
71%

Nokian
WetProof
68%

Mileage

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 65%

2. Nokian WetProof 61%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

2. Nokian WetProof ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autoklub ČR Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	104,7	106	103,4
Apollo Alnac 4G	96,7	97,3	96,1
Nokian WetProof	101,3	102,2	100,4
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,3	1,8
Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good	3,5	3,0
Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good	2,9	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,1	29,6
Apollo Alnac 4G	36,8	33,2
Nokian Wetproof	35,1	31,7
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,8	1,4	2,7	0,6
Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,6	2,8	2,0
Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	2,1	2,7	3,0
Show test details