Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Apollo (47%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 72% compared to 56% of the Apollo Alnac 4G. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G and the Roadhawk were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Apollo Alnac 4G | Firestone Roadhawk | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
2. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
1. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB2. Apollo Alnac 4G ? dB
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
Apollo Alnac 4G | 96,7 | 97,3 | 96,1 | ||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
Show test details |