Segment
1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle
Comparison: Aplus A919 vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Aplus) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Cooper). Generally, Cooper summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Aplus (1%). The first tyre test of Aplus A919 was done in 2023, compared to 2017 when was the Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/65 R17 test, where both the A919 and the Zeon 4XS Sport were tested.
| # | Aplus A919 | Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Aplus A919 12.
Worst position in test
2. Aplus A919 12.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Aplus A919 46%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Aplus A919 46%
Wet braking
2. Aplus A919 24%
Wet circle cornering
2. Aplus A919 42%
Wet handling
2. Aplus A919 35%
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
1. Aplus A919 100%
Gravel traction
1. Aplus A919 87%
Mud traction
1. Aplus A919 92%
Sand traction
1. Aplus A919 73%
Handling on gravel
1. Aplus A919 73%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Aplus A919 60%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Aplus A919 ? dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Aplus A919 45%
Dry handling
2. Aplus A919 46%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Aplus A919 46%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aplus A919 Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||