Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Yokohama (43%). In this particular case, the Yokohama W.drive V905 has a better rating of 35% compared to 24% of the Nokian WR SUV 3. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 3 and the W.drive V905 were tested.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3 | Yokohama W.drive V905 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 406 | 147 | 134 | 143 | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 390 | 131 | 128 | 131 | |||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: - | 324 | 59 | 134 | 123 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||