Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Toyo Snowprox S954 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Toyo (42%). In this particular case, the Toyo Snowprox S954 has a better rating of 44% compared to 24% of the Nokian WR SUV 3. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Toyo Snowprox S954 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 3 and the Snowprox S954 were tested.
# | Nokian WR SUV 3 | Toyo Snowprox S954 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Toyo Snowprox S954 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Toyo Snowprox S954 Satisfactory
1. Toyo Snowprox S954 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 ? dB
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 406 | 147 | 134 | 143 | |||
Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 390 | 131 | 128 | 131 | |||
Toyo Snowprox S954 Rating: - | 348 | 121 | 123 | 104 | |||
Show test details |