Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 50% compared to 24% of the Nokian WR SUV 3. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B rating.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3 | Nokian WR Snowproof P | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB2. Nokian WR SUV 3 ? dB