Segment
1. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR C3 vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian WR C3 has a better rating of 27% compared to 24% of the Nokian WR SUV 3. The first tyre test of Nokian WR C3 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR SUV 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Nokian WR C3 has E wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C rating.
| # | Nokian WR C3 | Nokian WR SUV 3 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR C3 72 dB2. Nokian WR SUV 3 ? dB