Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn I Fit LW31 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Laufenn winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than Yokohama (43%). In this particular case, the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has a better rating of 52% compared to 19% of the Laufenn I Fit LW31. The first tyre test of Laufenn I Fit LW31 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the I Fit LW31 and the BluEarth winter V905 were tested.
| # | Laufenn I Fit LW31 | Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | ||||||
| Laufenn I Fit LW31 | 39,4 | ||||||
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | 32,5 | 26 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||