Segment
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Kleber KRISALP HP3 has a better rating of 85% compared to 57% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Kleber KRISALP HP3 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the KRISALP HP3 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kleber KRISALP HP3 | Nokian WR Snowproof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 69 dB
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,9 | 1,8 | 2,2 | 1,8 | 2,8 | 2,5 |
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,7 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | 2 | ||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 2- | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 35,6 | 28,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 36,5 | 29,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 3+ | 1- | 2- | |||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 32,2 | 24 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 32,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||