Comparison: Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 vs. Nokian WR C3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 has a better rating of 44% compared to 27% of the Nokian WR C3. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the Cargo UltraGrip 2 and the WR C3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 60% of Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 91% of Nokian WR C3 has E rating.

#	Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 /44%	Nokian WR C3 /27%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R16	R14 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2

/44%

Nokian WR C3

/27%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R16

R14 - R17

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium

2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Nokian WR C3 23

2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 19

Number of tests

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 2x

2. Nokian WR C3 1x

Best position in test

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 5.

2. Nokian WR C3 7.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 5.

2. Nokian WR C3 7.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 5

2. Nokian WR C3 7

Year of the last test

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 2019

2. Nokian WR C3 2018

Best rating in test

1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended

2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Still recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended

2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Still recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR C3
61%

Goodyear
Cargo UltraGrip 2
60%

Dry braking

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 91%

2. Nokian WR C3 62%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
Cargo UltraGrip 2
59%

Nokian
WR C3
30%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 46%

2. Nokian WR C3 25%

Wet circle cornering

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 61%

2. Nokian WR C3 33%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 50%

2. Nokian WR C3 33%

Wet handling

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 73%

2. Nokian WR C3 33%

Wet braking

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 71%

2. Nokian WR C3 25%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 ?

2. Nokian WR C3 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR C3
97%

Goodyear
Cargo UltraGrip 2
69%

Snow handling

1. Nokian WR C3 100%

2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 66%

Snow traction

1. Nokian WR C3 100%

2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 56%

Snow braking

1. Nokian WR C3 100%

2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 45%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
Cargo UltraGrip 2
79%

Nokian
WR C3
66%

Exterior noise

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 88%

2. Nokian WR C3 81%

Interior noise

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 73%

2. Nokian WR C3 50%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nokian WR C3 72 dB

2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
Cargo UltraGrip 2
67%

Nokian
WR C3
43%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 ?

2. Nokian WR C3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
Cargo UltraGrip 2
81%

Nokian
WR C3
?

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

ProMobil Winter tyre test 2018 225/70 R15

Name
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Rating: Still recommended
Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended
Show test details

Comparison: Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 vs. Nokian WR C3

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands