Segment
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Let's compare two summer tyres: the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4.
The Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun is a versatile touring tyre, with quite a strong showing in our tests at 85%, offering reliable performance in varying road conditions. Known for its ease with dry handling and aquaplaning, it also provides greater comfort and effective wet braking. However, the tyre has shown slight shortcomings in the field of sustainability and fuel efficiency. The Falken ZE310 Ecorun is manufactured in Turkey.
Comparatively, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 scored slightly lower in our tyre tests at 82%. Despite this, the Dynaxer HP4 made a name in terms of comfort, exterior noise, and efficiency, boasting good marks in lifespan and wear. On the downside, some balance concerns and weaknesses on wet roads were highlighted.
In mutual tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun typically ranked higher. In Autobild's testing of 53 tyres, the Falken was ranked 8th while the Kleber came in 14th place. The story was similar in ADAC's test of 50 tyres - the Falken was 6th and the Kleber 12th. However, in GTÜ's test of 8 tyres, the Kleber Dynaxer was ranked 1st, outshining the 2nd place Falken.
In conclusion, both the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 have their strengths and weaknesses. Still, based on aggregated test data, the main difference boils down to the Falken's superior handling and aquaplaning management distinguishing it from Kleber's emphasis on comfort, noise reduction, and tyre efficiency.
Currently, these two tyres are the latest models from their respective manufacturers, Falken and Kleber, and there are no new models released to replace them. Stay tuned for future reviews and updates on our website.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good | |||||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 36,5 | 28,0 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 37,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,1 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 48 | 18 | 8 | |||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Recommended | 61 | 45 | 14 | 5 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Highly recommended | 61 | 48 | 17 | 8 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 35,8 | 31,4 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||