Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. Nexen N Fera SU 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. Nexen N Fera SU 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Bridgestone (57%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza Sport was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the Nexen N Fera SU 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2023 235/35 R19 test, where both the Potenza Sport and the N Fera SU 2 were tested. We also know where Potenza Sport is made - Poland/Hungary.
| # | Bridgestone Potenza Sport | Nexen N Fera SU 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nexen N Fera SU 2 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Nexen N Fera SU 2 | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||