Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 68% of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made in Korea.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2+ | ||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 1- | 2 | 2+ | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,1 | 28,1 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on ice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 13,9 | 14,8 | 16,4 | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 15,4 | 16,4 | 21,7 | ||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 14,6 | 15,8 | 22 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 101,6 | 299,9 | 299,9 | 100 | 101,1 | 100,7 | |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 100 | 285,8 | 299,8 | 100 | 87,6 | 99,8 | |
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 99,3 | 294,4 | 297,6 | 96,2 | 79,6 | 98,1 | |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1,3 | 2,1 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 2,5 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
Show test details |