Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /92%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /66%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 166

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 47x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.21

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2023

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
82%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
70%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 66%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 60%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
91%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
72%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 66%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
83%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
72%

Dry braking

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 70%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 65%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 74%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
78%

Exterior noise

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 82%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ? dB

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
71%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
69%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 51%

Mileage

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Price/value

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 54%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
79%

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,3	25,9
Show test details

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2+	2	3+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2	2
Show test details

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2	2	2
Show test details

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	2,0	1,8	2,7	2,4	2,1	3,4	2,5
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	3,5	2,0	2,2	2,5	2,7	2,5
Show test details

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,3	9,4	10	10	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,4	7,6	8,2	8	7
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Sufficient	8,3	8,2	4,3	4	6
Show test details

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,2	29,5
Show test details

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	100	285,8	299,8	100	87,6	99,8
Falken EuroWinter HS01	98	286,4	281,7	98,9	82,6	99,7
Show test details

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	200	64	47	60	17	7
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	167	63	45	39	10	5
Show test details

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Falken EuroWinter HS01	37	27
Show test details

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Falken EuroWinter HS01	33,9	26,1
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands