Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 has a better rating of 79% compared to 37% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2018 185/65 R15 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the SP Winter Response 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 also have B wet ratings. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 206 | 67 | 68 | 43 | 19 | 8 | 10 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended | 182 | 58 | 53 | 43 | 15 | 6 | 7 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Recommended | 186 | 62 | 57 | 39 | 16 | 6 | 6 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: - | 1,8 | 3,0 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: - | 1 | 2 | 1- | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 | 36,8 | 28,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||