10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nexen (43%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 89% compared to 63% of the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /89%	Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 /63%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R15 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 90

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 13x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 7.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 27.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 12.85

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
72%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 62%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 70%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 71%

Wet handling

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Wet circle cornering

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%

Dry braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 70%

Dry handling

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
72%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 74%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 96%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 80%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 65%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 68%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
84%

Exterior noise

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 92%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 75%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69 dB

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
71%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 63%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 62%

Price/value

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
69.5%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7	37,9	31,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7	36,3	26,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	3+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7	34	28,3
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands