10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than BFGoodrich (67%). In this particular case, the Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 has a better rating of 100% compared to 89% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2020 when was the Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the PILOT ALPIN 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and PILOT ALPIN 5 is made in France.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /89%	Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 /100%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 102

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 13x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 1.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 4.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 1.85

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 2023

Best rating in test

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 72%

Wet braking

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 63%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 73%

Wet handling

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet circle cornering

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 63%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
89%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%

Dry braking

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Dry handling

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 91%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
88%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 86%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 90%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 84%

Snow cornering

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 93%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
81%

Exterior noise

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 92%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 85%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69 dB

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
75%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 78%

Mileage

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 92%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
83.3%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
80.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Test winner	2+	2+	1	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5	34,3	29,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Test winner	2+	2+	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	1-	2+	1-
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands