10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 89% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /89%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /92%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 47x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.21

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
92%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
84%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
94%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
80%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
73%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
70%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 63%

Price/value

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
78%

Ice braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	3.1	2.1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1-	2	2-	3+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	31,4	30,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2+	2	3+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,7	1,9	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,5	1,5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,6	2,0	2,5	2,4	2,7	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,7	2,1	2,4	2,8	1,9	2,9	3,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	2+	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,2	1,9	2,5	3,3	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,7	2,5	2,8	2,3	3,3	3,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	7,8	6,6	7,4	10	5	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,7	9,6	8,6	8,2	8	7
Show test details

Használtautó.hu Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on ice
Best values in test	13,9	14,8	16,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	15,1	15,9	23,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	15,4	16,4	21,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Recommended	194	63	42	60	14	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	200	64	47	60	17	7
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Very good	7,0	7,3	9,9	10	8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	9,5	8,5	9,2	10	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands