Segment
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Lowcost2. Nankang NK Snow SV-2 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Apterra Winter vs. Nankang NK Snow SV-2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Nankang (17%). The first tyre test of Apollo Apterra Winter was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Nankang NK Snow SV-2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Apterra Winter and the NK Snow SV-2 were tested.
| # | Apollo Apterra Winter | Nankang NK Snow SV-2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Apollo Apterra Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 2,7 |
| Nankang NK Snow SV-2 Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 2,5 | 5,1 | 2,7 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||