Segment
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Apterra Winter vs. Barum Polaris 3 4x4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Barum (52%). In this particular case, the Apollo Apterra Winter has a better rating of 40% compared to 32% of the Barum Polaris 3 4x4. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Apterra Winter and the Polaris 3 4x4 were tested.
| # | Apollo Apterra Winter | Barum Polaris 3 4x4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Apollo Apterra Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 2,7 |
| Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||